Skip to main content

2012 & 2013 Electric Rate Adjustment

The 2012 Distribution System budget estimates revenues for 2012 at $45 million which includes a 7% rate adjustment. Operating expenses are estimated at $40.2 million, an increase of 4.6% primarily related to increased power supply cost. The budget anticipates a bond issue to fund long-lived capital additions such as substations and transmission lines. The bond issue will result in an estimated $917,000 increase in interest expense. The 2012 capital budget is $19.6 million, of which $16.9 million is for electrical facilities. Of the $16.9 million, $13.2 million is set aside for substation improvements and new transmission lines. These improvements will prevent overloads, improve reliability, and provide voltage support throughout the southern part of Douglas County.

Although the 2012 Distribution System budget includes a 7% rate adjustment, forecasts indicate a staged increase would be more appropriate, beginning with a 6% increase effective July 1, 2012 and a second 6% increase effective January 1, 2013. There have been three adjustments (2002, 2010 & 2011) to rates in the past 13 years. Normal inflationary pressure is one of the reasons a rate adjustment is currently needed. After applying both proposed adjustments, analysis of 25 years shows the inflation-adjusted cost per kilowatt hour for residential customers would be about the same as in 1989.

Rate with inflation 2012.jpg

The average monthly impact of a 6% increase for a residential customer would be about $3.00. The following graph shows a comparison of the District’s monthly residential electric bill, including the 6% increase, to the bills charged by other public utilities in Washington State.

Rate comps 2012.jpg

 In addition to inflationary pressure, other reasons for the rate adjustment include:

  • Low interest earnings on Douglas PUD’s conservative financial investments including the Washington State Government Investment Pool, Certificates of Deposit and U.S. Treasury Notes.
  • Depressed springtime surplus power prices.
  • The need for additional substation and transmission capacity driven by:
        • Several past years of accelerated growth in the East Wenatchee area
        • Electric reliability requirements
  • Interest cost on new Revenue Bonds to fund the needed substation and transmission capital projects.
        • Revenue bonds are a way to borrow money by pledging future revenues according to the Master Bond Resolution.
        • Electric rates must be sufficient to make the required principal and interest payments.
        • It is appropriate to fund long-lived assets such as substations, power lines and power plants with borrowed monies.
        • The District needs to retain its excellent credit rating (Bond Rating AA) in order to obtain the lowest possible financing costs. In the past the District would insure its bond sales to AAA to get low interest rates. There are no longer AAA rated bond insurance companies so the Douglas PUD credit rating is the one that will dictate the cost of borrowing (interest rates).
  • Increased hydropower costs related to rebuilding the Wells Project generating units and costs of a new Wells Project license.

Commissioners approved the rate adjustments June 11, 2012.

July 1, 2012 Rate Schedule

January 1, 2013 Rate Schedule